Course Description

This course is meant to be a space for you to examine and deepen your relationship to the field and your own practice through readings, discussions, and presentations.  The readings are meant to expand your perspective on the field of jewelry and metalsmithing, to define its particularities and concerns in relation to the discourses of the contemporary art world.

Together we will explore a series of seminal theoretical texts, seeking ways to relate them to our own practice.  Through these texts we will encounter a series of themes and historical perspectives that are crucial to the field of jewelry, while also delving into fields and areas of inquiry, that have not commonly been related to our field, but perhaps should or could be.  Our aim is to get a historical and interdisciplinary perspective on where we are as artists/makers today, how we got here and where we could go from here. The course aims to bring up critical questions on why we make, whom we make for and the meaning of our practice beyond the studio and the jewelry and metals world.

This is a chance to practice your skills in connecting theory, reading and writing to your work and to build a vocabulary and ground of reference around your ideas, interests and intentions. It’s a chance to take part in an intense discourse around your field, which you might be asked to do many times in the future of your career.

The Wednesday meetings will adopt the form of a reading/talking circle. Your role in the group is important and the success of our conversations will be based on your participation and engagement. We will all take turns in presenting and leading the discussion and also examine what “research through practice” might mean for us, by exploring some ways of connecting theory and making. 

Nov 7, 2009

Having Access to the Creative Process?


I read the Bourriaud article first and couldn't help but think of our conversation about Stella's Tilted Arc in relation to some of the interactive art described in his essay...

so it was interesting to have the arc referenced in the first page of the Kwon article:

"the board members of Sculpture Chicago were shocked to be told 'You're fooling yourself if you think by seeing a sculptor weld two pieces of steel together, somebody has a sense what art-making is'...Jacob's desire to shift the role of the viewer from passive spectator to active art maker became one of the central goals of Culture in Action and this project's scale and ambition, and the discussions it generated ... remains unrivaled in the post-Tilted Arc era."

what is a powerful yet subtle way to discuss site/public interaction (via the body?) or the idea of art-making without having to either put artists on display for people to watch or to create overly exaggerated "moments" for public to experience?

No comments:

Post a Comment