Course Description

This course is meant to be a space for you to examine and deepen your relationship to the field and your own practice through readings, discussions, and presentations.  The readings are meant to expand your perspective on the field of jewelry and metalsmithing, to define its particularities and concerns in relation to the discourses of the contemporary art world.

Together we will explore a series of seminal theoretical texts, seeking ways to relate them to our own practice.  Through these texts we will encounter a series of themes and historical perspectives that are crucial to the field of jewelry, while also delving into fields and areas of inquiry, that have not commonly been related to our field, but perhaps should or could be.  Our aim is to get a historical and interdisciplinary perspective on where we are as artists/makers today, how we got here and where we could go from here. The course aims to bring up critical questions on why we make, whom we make for and the meaning of our practice beyond the studio and the jewelry and metals world.

This is a chance to practice your skills in connecting theory, reading and writing to your work and to build a vocabulary and ground of reference around your ideas, interests and intentions. It’s a chance to take part in an intense discourse around your field, which you might be asked to do many times in the future of your career.

The Wednesday meetings will adopt the form of a reading/talking circle. Your role in the group is important and the success of our conversations will be based on your participation and engagement. We will all take turns in presenting and leading the discussion and also examine what “research through practice” might mean for us, by exploring some ways of connecting theory and making. 

Oct 12, 2009

Beautifugly...

Can you have beauty with out ugly?
Is beauty inherently linked to emotion?
Does beauty insinuate perfection?
Are beauty and ugliness linked to just the sense of sight, or do other senses play into our experience of 'ugly' and 'beautiful'?
In response to Hickey's article:
Can something be beautiful and ugly at the same time?

5 comments:

  1. I think that a great deal of everything has both beauty and ugly; nature, concepts, behaviors. We are surrounded by things that have a reciprocate, good and bad, happy and sad, light and dark, so why shouldn't beauty and ugly be one of those things? That is part of the balance that humans need to be comfortable.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't know. But I'm definitely gonna start using the word beautifugly. which is kinda what courtney was saying too - reciprocation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "It is so ugly that it's beautiful"
    I've heard that one.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I cant help but think "beauty is in the eye of the beholder"... but anyway..

    beauty is different for everyone. even just looking at our "40 materials" assignment, the materials that ryan, kate, and kendall all brought forward, respectively, are objects collected over time that they find beautiful. they each have a story behind them, and though aesthetically i may not look at some of these things and think "yes, that is beautiful", but the story behind it, the feeling it gives them, and thus the reason they picked it up in the first place, is beautiful. The fact that something picked off the street can make someone feel that way is beautiful.

    I feel i am an eternal optimist and think that there is more in life that is beautiful than there is that is ugly, but i dont look at at certain things and think they are beautiful because of something they might represent, or connotations that might be present.

    also i think many of us are here to make "beautiful" and desirable objects. I know I am.

    ReplyDelete
  5. also i agree completely with courtface

    ReplyDelete